The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.
The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.
The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.
That it supported the latest theory your rationalist epistemology tends to your a good reduced degree of wedding into the Involvement subscale therefore the constructivist epistemology seems on a heightened amount of wedding on the Involvement subscale
Thus, epistemology (rationalist compared to. constructivist) was seen to be a serious predictor out of procedures build. Particularly, the quintessential powerful results provide provisional service on the perception you to definitely there are particular variations in the non-public form of the fresh new therapist with regards to the therapists’ epistemic assumptions. Significantly more particularly, the current investigation discovered that therapists with rationalist epistemologies tended towards much more point, a reduced degree of involvement, good narrower notice, and you may a heightened amount of think inside their coaching having readers, while, new constructivist epistemology tended to the having a heightened amount of intimacy, an increased level of involvement, a bigger desire, and love of life inside their treatment training. At exactly the same time, there is particular help into notion one therapists with constructivist epistemologies are most likely on the brand new assistance out of independency in the place of rigidity into the their therapy build; but not this was maybe not an especially good searching for in the modern investigation.
Such conclusions are of help regarding the fresh possibly intrinsic variations maintained because of the rationalist as opposed to constructivist epistemologies according to procedures build. So much more particularly, latest conclusions contain the notion you to definitely cognitive-behavioral therapies, hence depict a knowledgeable depiction of your own rationalist epistemology, maintain an enthusiastic “active-directive” and you can logical victoria milan way of medication (Granvold, 1988) with certain goals regularly bundle the category of your own example (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).
Theory dos-Epistemology Influences the new Therapeutic Relationship
With regards to the 2nd theory-practitioners which have rationalist epistemologies will score large for the Activity and you may Goal subscales minimizing toward Thread subscale as compared to constructivist epistemologies-some other several linear regression design is used to determine if your exact same predictor varying (counselor epistemology) carry out influence therapists’ evaluations of your own standard details (doing work alliance) considering therapists’ millions of around three subscales-Task, Objective, and you will Bond.
